-
https://d1y502jg6fpugt.cloudfront.net/53651/archive/files/7a974aef8d8b8b1c4af84c9d2c5a2f73.jpeg?Expires=1712793600&Signature=bLDZumcrdSeMiYfaXugpE%7ErmrbAxsTEv9vglGbTwAplIhb%7EWyySz9rzxLhcYufABw4rI7JunWk3KLSqRboHdN8cSNW3%7EyK1TmiTj1o%7EeapxG2zNKbN%7E5kWC1fYWBUhKRgPbuE604D832VK%7EP4p7Ga-w%7ETmGqztlgm0VK-TdeBkh60CkbGe1mShLfSf1sNjgeQP3I6XOUF8dP20chR2E89ODaj%7EgbTMlMLnXRqptIQG%7ETDB29dAHN556%7E78IZyiWn5WYEFbexZJ6xywyMpIoSFIfE6HkMZoTasu9zp5xDlTKIoBZcqrvXcCJAY1dWeGEvKrOlVGzGxHE6bC3xibtRpg__&Key-Pair-Id=K6UGZS9ZTDSZM
2dfb9453d1c611c2637b544dce38b1c2
https://d1y502jg6fpugt.cloudfront.net/53651/archive/files/fbea60551d00c386330b1cf9707a7689.png?Expires=1712793600&Signature=SZie%7ELp%7Ek-itSmK5QVFxhm9Bxz2SRV7H8h3q%7E4BezTOgKeRoyvU9N9Yy3X1A0bGncVEcqxA1DSun3ZSxgti4i%7ENe04b4PXA%7EFtCLVOVFWffk9fUIKnyNlRjOYFxPV2nvgvKGIhxT8guMpUkriDet4gMH2sOuxVPhr0bxt3OdvjkpMBmIHlAI%7E6Pkm6TdkcKMF5YptnxRnpJlO71IU3dH1h4bwP98G5l-7c5JpkHlrqfD8eauDdIs2CgjhiHHHb5aK4GRaIfOtzQTA70Z9Vgdij05RGQczQB2u9QTpzM7jtzs7wHjdHM3w5nHrgId6LZfOba-ZEGJBCPaJNe4zRbuNw__&Key-Pair-Id=K6UGZS9ZTDSZM
24726cd606d3fbf23fffc205765fc34f
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Centennial Twitter Collection
Subject
The topic of the resource
2020 Centennial of Women's Suffrage Amendment
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Rachel B. Tiven
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Twitter.com
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
August 2019 to August 2020
Language
A language of the resource
English
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Description
An account of the resource
1. I’m immersed in the suffrage movement’s first major rupture, and grappling with how to acknowledge ElizCadyStanton & Susan B Anthony’s racism without dismissing them. <br /><br />2. Faye Dudden’s book Fighting Chance offers a scorching assessment of what happened... when a movement once committed to universal suffrage broke apart. Her book is particularly valuable for its dissection of the role of philanthropists’ dollars. Then as now, progressive work depends too much on the wealthy, which warps our advocacy and limits our effectiveness. <br /><br />3. Stanton & Anthony’s choices in 1868-69 were unforgivably racist. When they saw that the door was closing, that the Reconstruction amdts would make women worse off, they stooped lower. Dudden argues that’s because they were political realists, not naifs. They gambled, and lost. <br /><br />4. Did they know it would take 50 more years to win, and that Jim Crow would have strangled Black political power by then? It all turned out worse than anyone expected. And yet I can’t ‘cancel’ Stanton & Anthony, in current parlance. They slogged on for the rest of the century. <br /><br />5. They were deeply flawed, but their achievements were massive. Would the movement have been better off without them? One way to answer that is by comparing the ideology they built after the split to that of their rival suffrage faction, which supported the 15th A. Stay tuned.
Title
A name given to the resource
Reflections on the 1870 split
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Daily Suffragist
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
<a href="https://twitter.com/DailySuffragist/status/1189190196262125569" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Original thread.</a>
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
29/10/2020
15th Amendment
1868
Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Racism
Susan B Anthony